![]() |
![]() |
| Image | Name | Location | Twitter since | Links |
|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() | Matt Zemek | Seattle | 2009-03-25 | ![]() |
| @mzemek | 1,521 days | |||
| Tennis fan and big-ticket pro sports observer. College football tweets at @MattZemek_CFN (college hoops during the offseason). | ||||
| Followers | Following | Tweets | Lists | Favorites |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1,902 | 1,848 | 79,068 | 126 | 9 |
![]() | Matt Zemek @mzemek |
| Those matches would start anywhere from 5 to (more likely) 630 pm Paris time, meaning midday in New York, mid-morning on the U.S. West Coast | |
| 41s | |
![]() | Matt Zemek @mzemek |
| A Federer fan television advisory: With Fed slated to play Frenchmen, expect any of those matches to be the late ones at Chatrier. | |
| 2m | |
![]() | Matt Zemek @mzemek |
| @AndyMugray Isner's the only one other than Soderling???!!! Wow. | |
| 3m in reply to AndyMugray | |
![]() | Matt Zemek @mzemek |
| @RN_Tennis Oui. #OuiTweets | |
| 4m in reply to RN_Tennis | |
![]() | Matt Zemek @mzemek |
| Well, it's caveat time: I'll take Chardy over Tsonga, so Nadal over Fed in the final is the ATP pick at Roland Garros. #We #Gonna #See #No? | |
| 4m | |
![]() | Matt Zemek @mzemek |
| .@AndyMugray I'm giving Djokovic a strong chance (40 percent) versus Rafa, but I know which player I'd trust on RG in best-of-5 clay combat. | |
| 6m in reply to AndyMugray | |
![]() | Matt Zemek @mzemek |
| @TennisFanMark24 Would you say that's a four-set match? I'd say Federer would deserve to be about a 60-percent favorite if it happens. | |
| 8m in reply to TennisFanMark24 | |
![]() | Matt Zemek @mzemek |
| So, who will face Nadal in the final? If Tsonga makes the QFs, I think he beats Federer. However, Tsonga could lose to Chardy or Monaco 1st. | |
| 11m | |
![]() | Matt Zemek @mzemek |
| .@MisterPigz Remember how well Tsonga played in the QFs versus Djokovic last year? If that Jo shows up vs. Fed in QFs, Jo wins, oui? Oui. | |
| 13m in reply to MisterPigz | |
![]() | Matt Zemek @mzemek |
| About Tsonga: He surely faces some tricky matches, but he raised his game @ Roland Garros in 2012. If that "appetite for battle" is there... | |
| 14m | |
![]() | Matt Zemek @mzemek |
| @Sammyb01 Yeah, probably not. It's still a chance for him, but I don't expect him to rise to the occasion. | |
| 16m in reply to Sammyb01 | |
![]() | Matt Zemek @mzemek |
| Finally got a look at Federer's draw. As @15lovetennis told me, the French contingent is camped out here. Benneteau R-32? Tsonga QF? Thorny. | |
| 16m | |
![]() | Matt Zemek @mzemek | ||
| Unless the Berdych-Gulbis R64 winner storms into the quarters, Ferrer should have a seat at the semifinal table for the second straight year | |||
19m
| |||
![]() | Matt Zemek @mzemek |
| The top section in Ferrer's quarter could create bracket chaos... and a golden opportunity for Robredo, Seppi or Almagro to make a deep run. | |
| 20m | |
![]() | Matt Zemek @mzemek |
| @Janie5Jones This is different from saying that the match will be decided by the player who produces more excellence. :-) | |
| 22m in reply to Janie5Jones | |
![]() | Matt Zemek @mzemek |
| .@Janie5Jones I'd say that if Janowicz and Gasquet meet in the fourth round, the outcome will be decided by the one who does less crumbling. | |
| 23m in reply to Janie5Jones | |
![]() | Matt Zemek @mzemek |
| @amandarykoff It could have been Djokovic-Ferrer and Federer-Nadal in the semis, but the draw broke in Fed's favor this morning. | |
| 25m in reply to amandarykoff | |
![]() | Matt Zemek @mzemek |
| @amandarykoff In non-Eastern time zones, American viewers will have to watch it on a computer, not a TV, on June 7. #TapeDelay #TodayShow | |
| 26m in reply to amandarykoff | |
![]() | Matt Zemek @mzemek |
| OH MAN. #ReactionToTheBerdychGulbisSecondRoundMatchup -- The @TennisGods did not help @MungoNGus or @babblingbrat, which makes me sad. :-((( | |
| 27m | |
![]() | Matt Zemek @mzemek |
| Looking at Nadal's quarter of the draw. I'd say that with Wawrinka being less than 100 percent, Janowicz has a great shot at making the QFs. | |
| 29m | |
| Date | Followers | Following | Tweets | Avg daily total | New followers | New following | New tweets | Avg daily month | Follow rank | Tweet rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2013-05-24 | 1,902 | 1,848 | 79,068 | 52.0 | 54 | 101 | 3,013 | 127.6 | 2,983 | 103 |
| 2013-04-30 | 1,848 | 1,747 | 76,055 | 50.8 | 34 | 121 | 2,050 | 68.3 | 2,983 | 103 |
| 2013-03-31 | 1,814 | 1,626 | 74,005 | 50.4 | 3 | 3 | 7 | 0.2 | 2,984 | 106 |
| 2013-02-28 | 1,811 | 1,623 | 73,998 | 51.5 | -2 | 9 | 173 | 6.2 | 2,850 | 94 |
| 2013-01-31 | 1,813 | 1,614 | 73,825 | 52.4 | 116 | 41 | 2,133 | 68.8 | 2,768 | 89 |
| 2012-12-31 | 1,697 | 1,573 | 71,692 | 52.0 | 5 | 14 | 90 | 2.9 | 2,813 | 81 |
| 2012-11-30 | 1,692 | 1,559 | 71,602 | 53.2 | 15 | 73 | 395 | 13.2 | 2,760 | 72 |
| 2012-10-31 | 1,677 | 1,486 | 71,207 | 54.1 | -5 | 17 | 1,907 | 61.5 | 2,631 | 54 |
| 2012-09-30 | 1,682 | 1,469 | 69,300 | 53.9 | 44 | 15 | 1,752 | 58.4 | 2,622 | 52 |
| 2012-08-31 | 1,638 | 1,454 | 67,548 | 53.8 | 30 | 21 | 1,673 | 54.0 | 2,672 | 60 |
| 2012-07-31 | 1,608 | 1,433 | 65,875 | 53.8 | 101 | 102 | 2,575 | 83.1 | 2,583 | 58 |
| 2012-06-30 | 1,507 | 1,331 | 63,300 | 53.0 | 91 | 99 | 4,569 | 152.3 | 2,630 | 55 |
| 2012-05-31 | 1,416 | 1,232 | 58,731 | 50.5 | 80 | 115 | 4,178 | 134.8 | 2,724 | 53 |
| 2012-04-30 | 1,336 | 1,117 | 54,553 | 48.2 | 20 | 39 | 1,489 | 49.6 | 2,721 | 55 |
| 2012-03-31 | 1,316 | 1,078 | 53,064 | 48.1 | 25 | 41 | 291 | 9.4 | 2,576 | 51 |
| 2012-02-29 | 1,291 | 1,037 | 52,773 | 49.2 | 1 | 30 | 438 | 15.1 | 2,420 | 46 |
| 2012-01-31 | 1,290 | 1,007 | 52,335 | 50.2 | 87 | 84 | 3,503 | 113.0 | 2,160 | 34 |
| 2011-12-31 | 1,203 | 923 | 48,832 | 48.3 | 2 | 28 | 598 | 19.3 | 2,118 | 33 |
| 2011-11-30 | 1,201 | 895 | 48,234 | 49.2 | - | - | - | - | 1,966 | 29 |
| For remarks, suggestions and complaints, you can contact us at: info@twopcharts.com. On Twitter you can find us here: @seat_twopcharts |